Exploration Through ExampleExample-driven development, Agile testing, context-driven testing, Agile programming, Ruby, and other things of interest to Brian Marick
|
Wed, 17 Mar 2004Jonathan Kohl has posted a copy of an article of his on developer/tester pairing. Jason Yip suggests losing the term "agile": "Agile" is not test-driven development, continuous integration, simple design, whatever; it's any feature, any order, most valuable feature first. Part of the purpose of the workshop that led to the Agile Manifesto was to find a replacement for the term "lightweight processes." People felt that saying "I'm a Lightweight!" somehow didn't get the right message across to Gold Owners. "Agile" was certainly a success in those terms. Jason suggests it might have been too successful now that everyone's piling on. Perhaps, though I do think there are other unfortunate terms to go after first. However, Jason's definition doesn't capture two of the values the Manifesto documents:
Jeffrey Fredrick on confidence due to tests. And related: Alberto Savoia with some history of a testing tool company that's eaten its own dogfood. (Disclosure: I've done consulting for Agitar.) I was particularly interested in the effects of their dashboard, both good and bad. I remain wary of numbers. My normal preference is for dashboards and Big Visible Charts that are perceptual, fuzz out the precision in the data, and present the results of exploratory data analysis. But lots of numbers make it harder to game the system (consciously or unknowingly), and using the numbers in a system filled with human feedback ought to make them self-correcting. |
|